Canadian General-Tower Limited

 

A.     The Company

Canadian General-Tower Limited is a privately held polymer products company based in Cambridge, Ontario. The company is a leading manufacturer of coated fabrics for the automotive industry as well as other products such as pool and containment liners, roofing materials, decking, and binder cover-stock for the stationery market. With “constant innovation” as a key business principle, the company invests considerable resources in the design and development of new materials for automotive applications, such as its “Protein Leather,” developed by its R&D group in Cambridge, and is continually developing new designs for the appearance of its products.

 

Eighty percent of the company’s business is in the automotive sector. It is the largest supplier of vinyl seating material for motor vehicles serving customers located throughout the world. The remaining twenty percent of Canadian General-Tower’s business activity is in the production of swimming pool liners, containment materials for industry and new industrial roofing products.

 

Growth at Canadian General-Tower has been stable over the last 3–4 years. The company’s last major spurt occurred in 1998–99 when it acquired its Toledo, Ohio based subsidiary - Textileather Corporation. Consolidated sales for the Canadian manufacturing facility (Cambridge, ON) and the American subsidiary (Toledo, OH) were estimated to be in excess of $300 million for 2003.

 

Innovation vital to success

 

Innovation is a key part of Canadian General-Tower’s ongoing success.  The company’s technology group based in Cambridge, Ontario, has been responsible for developing the company’s new products or materials, such as “Protein Leather,” a blend of leather and vinyl for automotive seating uses. Innovation also takes place on the design side of the operation, allowing the company to meet evolving demands and tastes in the appearance, grain and patterns that are applied to such products as automotive vinyl fabric and swimming pool liners.

 

Employment Profile

 

Canadian General-Tower employees some 1,100 individuals, including management, 700 of these at the Cambridge facility, of whom 500 are unionized, and; another 400 in the Toledo facility, of whom 300 are unionized. Workers at the Cambridge plant are represented by the United Steelworkers. With few exceptions, the company’s workforce is full-time.

 

The major occupational categories represented at Canadian General-Tower are: operators (skilled positions), maintenance tradespersons, and semi-skilled employees (forklift operators, materials cutters, inspectors, etc.). At the Cambridge facility, some 50–55 people are employed as tradespersons (electricians, mechanical, pipefitters) and another 20–30 work in the highly skilled, technical/technological area, and an additional 35 workers specialize in product development and design.

 

Employee Turnover Low

 

The company estimates that the employee turnover rate at its Cambridge facility is in the range of 4% to 4.5%, a figure that the company itself considers ‘average’ relative to other companies, but which indeed appears to be quite low compared to industry averages. Turnover includes a few retirements from the company’s workforce (the average age of the workforce is 43–44 years).

 

Canadian General-Tower attributes its low turnover in part to the fact that it is a well-known employer in a relatively small community. Seventy percent of the company’s employees actually live in Cambridge, while many of the remaining employees live within neighbouring communities. The company notes that it is very common to see several generations of the same family working at the Cambridge plant.

 

Generally speaking, then, Canadian General-Tower does not feel that it has a turnover problem. The company is able to fill vacancies relatively quickly, and turnover is not strongly concentrated in particular occupational groups. However, the hiring of journeypersons in the maintenance trades area can often be more difficult than it is with other occupational groups.

 

Nevertheless, the company notes that higher rates of turnover would be a significant problem, and does engage in a number of activities and programs that potentially affect its employee retention. For example, external compensation reviews are frequently conducted to ensure that the employer is offering a wage that remains competitive.

 

 

B.     Programs & Initiatives Affecting Employee Retention

Compensation and Benefits

 

Compensation reviews are regularly undertaken to ensure that the company is offering its employees a competitive wage. Canadian General-Tower sees its own compensation levels as being average within the industry. In addition, internal salary reviews are also conducted in an effort to ensure that there is wage equity among comparable jobs and qualifications within the company.

 

The company is not extensively involved with incentive plans except at the executive level, and phased out its profit sharing plan many years ago. However, Canadian General Tower does have an individual merit increase system in place. Wage or salary increases based on individual merit are closely tied to the company’s goal setting process.

 

According to the company, Canadian General-Tower’s employee benefits plan was at the leading edge when it was introduced in 1991. The plan continues to be comprehensive and flexible, allowing employees to change their benefits options annually, and also includes a “defined contribution plan” provision. Pre-retirement counseling is available to employees over the age of 50. The company also has an Employee Assistance Program.

 

Training & Development a Must

 

Canadian General-Tower is extensively involved in the training and professional development of its employees. It feels strongly that good training programs and ample opportunities for career growth within the company are the key to Canadian General-Tower’s success in keeping its employees. Programs offered by the company include:

 

  1. Educational Assistance. The company provides educational assistance to all employees, covering up to 90% of educational or training costs, to a yearly limit of $1,500.

  2. Health & Safety. The company’s health and safety training is extensive and goes well beyond what is provincially mandated.

  3. Cross Training. A formal cross-training program exists in the company’s printing department. People are given the opportunity to qualify themselves in the operation of a number of different printing machines and equipment.

  4. Apprenticeship Training. The company sponsors two apprentices in the maintenance trades area at any given time. Interested members of the existing staff are selected for assessment at nearby Conestoga College.

  5. Succession Planning. The company’s formal succession planning initiative aims to identify high potential employees among the professional and management group who may be candidates for internal promotion. The company conducts assessments to identify potential successors, determine the training they will need upon promotion, the amount of time it will take for them to be ready to assume their new responsibilities, and the most likely avenues for promotion.

  6. Training Plans for Salaried Employees. Training plans for salaried employees are formalized after performance reviews, and the company conducts follow-ups every 3–4 months.

  7. Orientation & New Employees. Orientation training is provided to all new employees, whether they are hourly or salaried. Where relevant, new employees are provided with “thorough and comprehensive” training in technical development areas, quality engineering areas, and safety and health areas.

 

Shift Scheduling Options

 

Some 80 people work under alternative shift arrangements. Under this plan, employees work 12–hour shifts on Saturdays and Sundays, and are off from Monday to Friday. Employees working under this shift schedule earn the equivalent of a full, 42 hour workweek.

 

Recruitment & Selection

 

For hourly wage earners within the company, a formal job posting system allows the company to recruit from within its existing workforce. Candidates selected for a posting are provided with the training that is needed to assume their responsibilities. Each position that is left open as a result of the new posting is re-posted into the system with similar provisions for all existing employees who wish to fill the vacancy, thereby creating a ‘chain’ of postings. The internal job posting system allows hourly wage earners to apply for supervisory positions before the company recruits externally. This represents an additional potential benefit to the company in terms of reduced training periods and recruitment lead times for such positions.

 

Canadian General-Tower also strongly encourages employee referrals, as these are the company’s main source of new recruitments. The company uses this system frequently as a more reliable alternative than placing external advertisements for vacancies.

 

Work Teams & Participative Management

 

Canadian General-Tower has had some involvement with self-directed work teams, with mixed results. An attempt to implement self-directed teams in the plant’s dry laminating facility was abandoned after no significantly positive results could be observed. The company does, however, operate a small distribution centre in Brantford, Ontario. The centre’s employees work in a self-directed team environment, and no grievances or turnover have been observed in that location.

 

On the whole the company admits it has not gone very far in the area of participative management. However, such work arrangements are likely to be more commonplace at Canadian General-Tower with its recent decision to implement the Six Sigma® system.

 

Communications

 

Although there is no regular system of newsletters or communication, the company does communicate frequently with employees during periods of major change. The company started to implement the Theory of Constraints management system in March of 2002. In connection with this initiative, the company circulated monthly newsletters and held small group meetings to explain to employees what the company was in the process of doing.

 

The company also develops charters for particular business areas in which improvements are being sought. The charters are communicated to the relevant salaried employees, and are subsequently used for individual goal setting for these employees.

 

 Recognition & Awards

 

The company gives non-monetary service awards for long-standing service to the company. The company also has an employee recreation association that organizes festival nights-out, parties, baseball teams and participation in an annual dragon boat racing event. These activities are funded by the company.

 

 

Other Initiatives

 

The company has a 5-day-a-week casual wear policy.

 

C.     The Employee/Union Perspective

Plant workers and maintenance tradespeople at Canadian General-Tower are represented by Local 862 of the United Steelworkers. The current president of the union local, who has worked at the company for 27 years, says that relations between workers and management at the company have seen their highs and lows, but reports the relationship has been constructive for the past number of years.

 

The union representative feels that a number of factors have contributed to good retention at Canadian General-Tower. People are, firstly, very satisfied to be working in a clean, well-organized manufacturing plant. Workers also recognize that the wages and benefits are very competitive for the region.

 

The company’s alternate shift scheduling policy — referred to as ‘weekend crewing’ — is also highly valued by many of the plant’s workers. It was negotiated some 17 years ago, at the initiative of the Local, and is seen by the union as having survived so long because it was perceived as being mutually beneficial to both workers and management.

 

Union Support for Training

 

While the representative still felt that the company had some way to go in establishing a truly comprehensive training program, he felt that the plant’s workers were generally happy with the level of training support provided. It should be noted that unionized employees frequently deliver the actual in-house training. In addition, employees are involved in a lot of ‘educational training.’ For example, members of the joint pension committee are actively involved in educating plant employees on retirement planning and investing for their pensions.

 

The union has also been very supportive of the ‘pay for knowledge’ cross-training program implemented in the company’s printing department. The program has conferred mutual benefits to both the company and its employees. According to the union, this program provides the skills the company needs to ‘upshift’ during its peak business periods, and also allows it to go after more business than it could if it didn’t have the necessary flexibility in place. This, in turn, translates into increased job security for workers, and better compensation.

 

Improved Communications

 

While there is still room for improvement, the union’s representative feels that communications between the company and its workers are quite open, and that a high level of trust exists between the two parties. Things were not always this way. Some 15 years ago, according to the union, relations had hit rock bottom, with many disputes in evidence but little resolution to outstanding problems. Canadian General-Tower’s CEO at the time led the way in mending relations and opening the channels of communication with the company’s workers. External training was even provided to both union and company representatives in order to create a more cooperative culture.

 

Today, the company and the union enjoy very open communications. Monthly joint meetings require a high degree of openness on the part of the company. It shares financial and core business information from time to time with union representatives, and workers are generally well apprised of major changes in operations.

 

Relations have been somewhat more strained recently due to the difficulties faced by the industry over the past 3–4 years. But even in these difficult times, workers have been willing to accept — by a margin of 89% in favour — a less-than-optimal one-year collective agreement (where normally 3-year contracts were the norm). The union credits this, in part, to the fact that workers at the company were given enough information to help them understand why the company was experiencing the difficulties it was going through.

 

Of course, the 1-year agreement did provide some modest wage increases, but the true strength of the cooperative nature of relations at Canadian General-Tower is the fact that both sides have seen the benefits in having good relations, and have built up a high level of trust over many years.

 

Conclusion

 

The company does not have an explicitly articulated policy on retention, nor does it seek to integrate its many human resource practices into its broader performance goals or strategic vision. Indeed, it is somewhat skeptical about the possibility of linking the outcomes of these various initiatives to performance goals in a way that is reliable and measurable. Nevertheless, the company appears to have an excellent retention record, and this can be credited to good compensation, good communications, an extensive training program that provides excellent opportunities and skills development for its workers, and a cooperative and open relationship with its labour union.

© 2007 Canadian Plastics Sector Council